<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction to JSR-227</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techartifact.com/blogs/2009/06/introduction-to-jsr-227.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techartifact.com/blogs/2009/06/introduction-to-jsr-227.html</link>
	<description>Latest tip and information on Java and Oracle ADF</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:11:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techartifact.com/blogs/2009/06/introduction-to-jsr-227.html/comment-page-1#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techartifact.com/blogs/?p=727#comment-826</guid>
		<description>I see JSR-227 being critical as a business-case enabler, not just a technical enabler. After all, WebMethods and JBoss already do a good job at gluing together the disparate technologies.

I think for &quot;cloud&quot; services to take off and be accepted by clients, appart from changing the name from &quot;cloud&quot; to something less ephemeral, standards like JSR-227 need to be adopted broadly by service integrators and providers.  Otherwise how, as a customer, do I avoid the next wave of consumer lock-in?

I would think HP, IBM, Microsoft and Sun/Oracle can all partner to make &quot;the cloud&quot; more attractive by focussing on work such as this, and I&#039;ll be pushing from the inside where I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see JSR-227 being critical as a business-case enabler, not just a technical enabler. After all, WebMethods and JBoss already do a good job at gluing together the disparate technologies.</p>
<p>I think for &#8220;cloud&#8221; services to take off and be accepted by clients, appart from changing the name from &#8220;cloud&#8221; to something less ephemeral, standards like JSR-227 need to be adopted broadly by service integrators and providers.  Otherwise how, as a customer, do I avoid the next wave of consumer lock-in?</p>
<p>I would think HP, IBM, Microsoft and Sun/Oracle can all partner to make &#8220;the cloud&#8221; more attractive by focussing on work such as this, and I&#8217;ll be pushing from the inside where I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mukul Gupta</title>
		<link>http://www.techartifact.com/blogs/2009/06/introduction-to-jsr-227.html/comment-page-1#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>Mukul Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techartifact.com/blogs/?p=727#comment-815</guid>
		<description>I wish there was more interest in JSR -227 from folks other than at Oracle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish there was more interest in JSR -227 from folks other than at Oracle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PimpThisBlog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techartifact.com/blogs/2009/06/introduction-to-jsr-227.html/comment-page-1#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>PimpThisBlog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techartifact.com/blogs/?p=727#comment-813</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;introduction-to-jsr-227 &#124; techartifact...&lt;/strong&gt;

Thank you for submitting this cool story - Trackback from PimpThisBlog.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>introduction-to-jsr-227 | techartifact&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Thank you for submitting this cool story &#8211; Trackback from PimpThisBlog.com&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

